Home

Officers

Links

BellSouth
New at&t


Old AT&T

Avaya/Lucent


Legislative


 CWA E- Politics

Back to Legislative Page         

CWA E-Politics 04-08-03 

  03-06-03


We are sending you the first edition of our new e-Politics newsletter because you are a member of CWA's e-Activist or News and Information e-mail lists.  If you wish to continue to receive this newsletter, please click here to sign up for our e-Politics e-mail list: http://www.cwa-union.org/get_active/politics.asp .  We will not continue to send you this newsletter unless you let us know that you want to receive it by signing up.
Welcome to the first edition of the e-Politics newsletter.  We are very excited about this first issue and we will bring you useful information about politics and issues affecting our members. 

 

Bush Approval Plunges In New Poll
A new Harris Poll shows President Bush's approval ratings fell 12 points in the last two months.

In a poll taken 2/12-16/03, only 52% of the respondents said President Bush was doing an excellent or good job. 

 

Forty-six percent rated his performance as fair or poor.  In the last Harris poll taken Dec. 12-16, 2002, 64% rate Bush's performance as excellent or good and 35% said it was fair or poor.


World Bank: Unions Can Improve Economies
 
A country's economy may fare better if a large number of its workers belong to trade unions, the World Bank said in a study that marked a departure from the institution's traditional frosty approach to organized labor.

The report, released on Wednesday, found that high unionization rates can lead to lower unemployment and inflation rates, higher productivity and faster adjustment to economic shocks.

"The bank in the past has perhaps been hostile to trade unions, and the thing with this book is that it wants to have a very open and nuanced approach, different from the past," Robert Holzmann, the bank's director of social protection, told Reuters. "So no blank check to trade unions but a major offer to work with them because they're crucial."

The report said union members in rich and poor countries alike get significantly higher average wages than workers who are not affiliated with a trade union.

In the United States, wages can be 15 percent higher for union members while in other industrialized countries, they are between 5 and 10 percent higher. The benefits of union membership can vary in middle-income and developing countries.

The study also found that union participation can reduce wage gaps between skilled and unskilled workers and also between men and women.

 


 

Bush Support for 2004 Dips Below 50%
The share of Americans favoring President Bush's reelection in 2004 has fallen below 50%, while Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut and John F. Kerry of Massachusetts have emerged as the leaders for the Democratic nomination to oppose him, a new Los Angeles Times poll has found.

 

Just 45% of registered voters said they are now likely to support Bush for reelection, while 40% said they were inclined to back the Democratic nominee, the survey found. Fifteen percent said they don't now lean in either direction.

 

As recently as December, just over half of the adults in a Times poll said they would likely support Bush for reelection in a question that was phrased slightly differently.

 

Though opinions are likely to change several times before voters go to the polls in 2004, the new results suggest that the close partisan balance that defined American politics before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks is slowly reasserting itself.

 

"We are a country that is roughly split," said Dowd, the RNC pollster, "and very polarized."

 


Bush Rule Change Could End Some Overtime

 

A Bush administration overhaul of decades-old labor regulations could force many Americans to work longer hours without overtime pay.

 

The administration argues that the pillars of American labor law, which established the 40-hour work week, a minimum wage and overtime pay, are antiquated.

 

The changes, Labor Department officials say, would make more lower-income workers eligible for overtime.

 

But labor unions fear changes would severely restrict who is legally required to be paid for overtime work.

 

"Nothing prohibits employers from requiring as many hours as they want,'' said Chris Owens, public policy director for the AFL-CIO. "The overtime pay requirement is the only thing that acts as a brake on excessive work hours.''

 

It is just one of several changes the administration is pursuing to workplace regulations and programs, including the Family Medical Leave Act, job training programs and unemployment insurance.

 

The overtime changes are confined to a section of the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act that defines blue-collar and white-collar workers and determines who must be paid an hourly rate of time-and-a-half for working beyond 40 hours a week. About 80 million workers now are covered by the overtime rules.

 

 

GOP-Still the Party of Big Business
Fundraising statistics compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics show that of the top ten most politically generous industries, eight gave a majority of their contributions to the Republican party.

Only the communications and electronics industry, which gave 63 percent of its contributions to Democrats, and lawyers who gave 93 percent of their contributions to Democrats, bucked the trend.

The agribusiness, construction, defense, energy, and financial services industries, among several others, gave the bulk of their money to the GOP.

 


Labor Law
Labor Secretary Describes Financial Forms Filed by Unions as 'Virtually Meaningless'


Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao Jan. 31 described the annual financial forms unions are required to file under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act as "virtually meaningless."

In an address to a meeting of the American Conservative Union, Chao defended her agency's proposed changes to union financial accounting forms, known as the LM-2, against charges that the effort is " 'antiunion.' Nothing could be further from the truth,' " she said, describing the proposal as "pro-union-member."

 

"All of that has got to change," Chao said, emphasizing that union members "need to know their rights and have the ability to exercise them." Despite the U.S. Supreme Court's 1988 decision in Communications Workers of America v. Beck (1487 U.S. 735, 28 LRRM 2729), "few workers are even aware" that they have "the right to refuse to subsidize political activities through union representation fees," Chao asserted. While it is "still a tough legal battle," she said, "one day the Beck decision will truly be the law of the land."

 

President Bush in February 2001 issued Executive Order 13201 requiring federal contractors to notify union-represented employees who pay agency fees in lieu of union dues that they need not contribute to union expenditures that are unrelated to collective bargaining, contract administration, or the adjustment of grievances. The administration currently is appealing a district court's finding that the order is invalid.

 


The Bush Credibility Gap
Fiscal Responsibility

 

Bush Says: "One of the ways we've got to make sure that we keep our economy strong is to be wise about how we spend our money. If you overspend, it creates a fundamental weakness in the foundation of economic growth. And so I'm working with Congress to make sure they hear the message -- the message of fiscal responsibility." -Bush, 9/16/02

 

Bush Does: Less than 6 months after this pronouncement, Bush proposed a budget that would put the government more than $300 billion into deficit. As National Journal noted on 2/12/02, Bush's own 2004 budget tables show that without Bush's tax and budgetary proposals, the deficit would decline after 2006, but with Bush's proposals the deficit would grow indefinitely.

 

(Excerpts from House Appropriations Committee Dems. special report, The Credibility Gap, 02/14/03)

 

HAVE DEFICITS LOST THEIR POLITICAL STING? NOT LIKELY
73% of Americans Are Concerned About Deficits That Could Result from the Bush Budget Proposal

"After a few golden years of surpluses, deficits are back with a vengeance. Though he ran for office promising to keep the government treasury in the black, [President] Bush's budget proposal predicts deficits of more than $300 billion through 2004 - and doesn't envision a new surplus in any year before a second Bush term would end. Bush claims he made it clear in the 2000 campaign that he would accept deficits in times of war, recession or national emergency, though White House staffers have failed to find an instance when he actually said that...."

 

"But the public may not be quite so easy to placate. A TIME/CNN poll conducted last week shows that 73% of Americans are either 'very' or 'somewhat' concerned about deficits that could result from the Bush budget proposal. More than a third - 36% - think the Bush plan will make the economy worse, while only 27% think it will make the economy better. And fully 55% of the respondents describe economic conditions today as 'poor' or 'very poor' - the highest figure since December 1993. 

 

Retirees Losing Benefits From Bankruptcy

 

The nation's persistent economic slump and rash of corporate scandals that have drained cash from pension plans and 401(k) accounts are eating into yet another piece of retirees' livelihood: their health benefits.

 

Thousands of retired workers who were promised lifetime health care coverage by their former companies have lost those benefits as a growing list of firms have folded or been sold.

 

 


Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.

http://cwa-union.org/action/political/cope/index.asp

If you know anyone who would like to sign up have them visit this web address: http://www.cwa-union.org/get_active/politics.asp
 Tell-a-friend!

If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for CWA e-Activist Network.
If you would like to unsubscribe from this e-mail list or update your account information, click here http://www.unionvoice.org/cwa_action/smp.tcl?nkey=3xbwk2q7edm. If you would like to unsubscribe from ALL e-mail lists associated with the CWA e-Activist Network, you can respond to this email with "REMOVE" as the subject.

 

Back to top of this page